Bears 84
Bengals 84
Bills 81
Broncos 90
Browns 81
Buccaneers 84
Cardinals 83
Chargers 81
Chiefs 83
Colts 80
Cowboys 81
Dolphins 83
Eagles 81
Falcons 80
49ers 93
Giants 78
Jaguars 77
Jets 80
Lions 84
Packers 84
Panthers 84
Patriots 84
Raiders 81
Rams 83
Raven 86
Redskins 79
Saints 85
Seahawks 88
Steelers 80
Texans 82
Titans 79
Vikings 82
These are the true ratings on the franchise
Team ratings on the franchise
Re: Team ratings on the franchise
Yea I thought I was weird I was rated higher on the draft order. Redo order?
alteast make it easy and put them in order if u want him to change it. U want the change, do the work lol
I think these overalls reflect the team scheme. If Madden didn't do that then everyone would get confused when the take the Seahawks with the best overall, then play their first game at 88 ovr. And think they did something wrong. So once in a league it shows the scheme based ratings, and how they will be when you pick that team.
This was from entering into the cfm, nothing scheme based because we were choosing teams,
Kind of like who's on first and what's on second
Kind of like who's on first and what's on second
I loaded the same rosters and did a practice, none of these ratings showed up.
Also when choosing the team in cfm, it also has the scheme of every team right below the ratings, maybe so smart people figure out they are scheme based ratings.
Seattle isn't magically the 4th best team after roster update they have the same guys. Same with Oakland, 8 teams didn't become worse than Oakland, none of that seems out of place?
Also when choosing the team in cfm, it also has the scheme of every team right below the ratings, maybe so smart people figure out they are scheme based ratings.
Seattle isn't magically the 4th best team after roster update they have the same guys. Same with Oakland, 8 teams didn't become worse than Oakland, none of that seems out of place?
titanbrian wrote:I loaded the same rosters and did a practice, none of these ratings showed up.
Also when choosing the team in cfm, it also has the scheme of every team right below the ratings, maybe so smart people figure out they are scheme based ratings.
Seattle isn't magically the 4th best team after roster update they have the same guys. Same with Oakland, 8 teams didn't become worse than Oakland, none of that seems out of place?
Intersting.....I did use "Play Now" for ratings with the roster we are using.
The ratings I used have got to be the better measurement right?
|
|